It is written: “We know that the law is good if one uses it properly. We also know that the law is not made for the righteous but for lawbreakers and rebels, the ungodly and sinful, the unholy and irreligious; for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, for adulterers and perverts, for slave traders and liars and perjurers- and for whatever else is contrary to the sound doctrine that conforms to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which he entrusted to me.” -1 Timothy 1:8-11
Manmade codified law is not the same as spiritual law as taught in Holy Scripture! Manmade law is inferior, lessor to spiritual Biblical Law.
The main purpose of law is to expose sin! “What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.” -Romans 7:7. “Now it is clear that no one is justified before God by the law, because, “The righteous will live by faith.” -Galatian 3:11
Christ Jesus: “Woe to you lawyers, because you have taken away the key to knowledge (scriptural truth). You yourselves did not enter, and you held back those who were entering [by your flawed interpretation of God’s word and your man-made tradition].” -Luke 11:52 Amplified Bible
“All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written: ‘Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law’. Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because the righteous will live by faith.”–Galatian 3:10-11 Legal Fiction
“[Law] is the sum total of the rules men and women live by if there is to be any order. No society can last long without some kind of legal system. … [The Ten Commandments] are woven into the fabric of Western Society.” –You and the Law, Reader’s Digest © 1981
“We tend to think of the law as complex, something that only lawyers, judges, and legal educators can comprehend. Yet the history of the law can be viewed as a tale of human choices about the preservation of life, the protection of property, the exercise of individual liberty, the fashioning of creative knowledge, and other basic social concepts.” -The Oxford Guide- American Law, edited by Kermit L. Hall
The Bible in American Law [The] “Bible’s influence on law faced increasing challenges, and only laws that can be defended on secular grounds have survived into the twenty-first century.”
“Legalism is rules without relationship, emphasizing standards more than the Savior, and laws more than love. It is a system based on fear and characterized by joyless judgmentalism, producing futility instead of freedom.” -Michael Brown
“Because every law springs from a system of values and beliefs, every law is an instance of legislating Morality. Further, because a nation’s laws always exercise a pedagogical or teaching influence, law inescapably exerts a shaping effect over the beliefs, character, and actions of the nation’s citizens, whether for good or ill. Those who seek to separate morality from law, therefore, are in pursuit both of the impossible and the destructive. The question before us is never whether or not to legislate morality, but which moral system ought to be made legally binding.” -Michael Bauman
“There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.” -James 4:12 “Do not add to what I [the LORD] command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the Lord your God that I give you.” -Duet. 4:2
“And what other nation is so great as to have such righteous decrees and laws as this body of laws I am setting before you today?” -Deuteronomy 4:8
“If the 20th Century has taught us anything, it is that atheistic, communist regimes produce the cruelest acts and most tyrannical of governments, denying the sovereignty of God and the dignity of every man.” –Judicial Tyranny, the new kings of America, Mark I. Sunderland, et. al.
Headline: Lawyer Complaints Overwhelm System; (Vermont) Valley News, Friday, October 18, 1992
“Erosion of personal responsibilities- First, in denying moral [Biblical] accountability … It has become virtually routine for defense lawyers to argue that defendants were abused as children, denied proper moral training, raised in abject poverty, plagued with learning disabilities, or something of the sort.” -Justice That Restores, Charles Colson; page 62 (Charles Colson use to write speeches for U.S. President Richard Nixon; pg. 57
“Like their Greek contemporaries, early Roman advocates were trained in rhetoric*, not law, and the judges before whom they argued were also not law-trained. … Therefore, if one narrows the definition to those men who could practice the legal profession openly and legally, then the first lawyers would have to be the orators of ancient Rome. -wikipedia
*Rhetoric [is typical] as the art of persuasion yielding belief but not knowledge. -Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion, W.L. Reese
VT lawyers reach record numbers (The Burlington Free Press 4-27-04 Excerpts)
- “The number of lawyers in the state is at a record level. So is the number of lawyers per capita. Vermont’s supply of lawyers ranks at or near the top 10 states.”
- “The current tally from the state Bar Examiner’s Office shows a near-quadrupling, to 2,403. Factoring in Vermont’s population growth over those years, there is one lawyer in Vermont for every 257 people.”
“A Killington lawyer was found guilty in 2008 of gross negligent operation of a motor vehicle, leaving the scene of an accident, lying to a police officer and impeding a police officer.” Rutland Herald, High Court to hear lawyer’s appeal, 8-31-10
Chuck Colson of Prison Fellowship Ministries (in 112 countries) stated that: “our Nation has become a lawyer-acracy. A nation of the lawyers, by the lawyers, and for the lawyers.” And in his book entitled Justice That Restores, he explains why our justice system doesn’t work (emphasis added) and the only method of true reform.
Henry Thoreau said, “For eighteen hundred years…the New Testament has been written, yet where is the legislator who has wisdom and practical talent enough to avail himself of the light which it sheds on the science of legislations?”
Mr. Boorstin, once Librarian of Congress, Pulitzer and National Book Award winner, and a lawyer, writes, “we have yet to see a government that has ruled a society effectively without providing its people with some persuasive way of believing that their laws come from some higher, deeper, indwelling source.”
“The rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.” –President John F. Kennedy (1961). If there is no God, your rights cannot come from anywhere else except from the “generosity of the State”. The State, then, becomes the new god. And what ever the State “giveth,” the State can “taketh awayeth”. …Thus Communism teaches that citizens exist for Government’s benefit; whereas America’s founders believed that Government existed for the citizens’ benefit. Without God, government transitions from being the policeman protecting your property to a police state owning your property. Without God, government transitions from being your servant to your master.
Individuals can no longer participate in the legal system.
“It has become too complex and too expensive, all the while feeding our dependency on lawyers. By complicating the law, lawyers have achieved the ultimate job security.
Gone are the days when American courts functioned to serve justice simply and swiftly. It is estimated that 95 million legal actions now pass through the courts annually, and the time and expense for a plaintiff or defendant in our legal system can be absolutely overwhelming. Surely it’s time to question what has happened to our justice system and to wonder if it is possible to return to a system that truly does protect us from wrongs.” -John F. Molloy was elected to the Arizona Court of Appeals, where he served as chief justice and authored more than 300 appellate opinions.
As Published in The Liberty Proclaimer , December Issue, page 8; The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion Law loses its way. By John F. Molloy
When I began practicing law in 1946, justice was much simpler. I joined a small Tucson practice at a salary of $250 a month, excellent compensation for a beginning lawyer. There was no paralegal staff or expensive artwork on the walls. In those days, the judicial system was straightforward and efficient. Decisions were handed down by judges who applied the law as outlined by the Constitution and state legislatures.
Cases went to trial in a month or two, not years. In the courtroom, the focus was on uncovering and determining truth and fact. I charged clients by what I was able to accomplish for them. The clock did not start ticking the minute they walked through the door.
Looking back
The legal profession has evolved dramatically during my 87 years. I am a second-generation lawyer from an Irish immigrant family that settled in Yuma. My father, who passed the Bar with a fifth-grade education, ended up arguing a case before the US. Supreme Court during his career. The law changed dramatically during my years in the profession. For example, when I accepted my first appointment as a Pima County judge in 1957, I saw that lawyers expected me to act more as a referee than a judge. The county court I presided over resembled a gladiator arena, with dueling lawyers jockeying for points and one-upping each other with calculated and ingenuous briefs.
That was just the beginning.
By the time I ended my 50-year career as a trial attorney, judge and president of southern Arizona’s largest law firm, I no longer had confidence in the legal fraternity I had participated in and, yes, profited from. I was the ultimate insider, but as I looked back, I felt I had to write a book about serious issues in the legal profession and the implications for clients and society as a whole.
The Fraternity:
Lawyers and Judges in Collusion was 10 years in the making and has become my call to action for legal reform.
Disturbing evolution
Our Constitution intended that only elected lawmakers be permitted to create law. Yet judges create their own law in the judicial system based on their own opinions and rulings. It’s called case law, and it is churned out daily through the rulings of judges. When a judge hands down a ruling and that ruling survives appeal with the next tier of judges, it then becomes case law, or legal precedent This now happens so consistently that we’ve become more subject to the case rulings of judges rather than to laws made by the lawmaking bodies outlined in our Constitution.
This case-law system is a constitutional nightmare because it continuously modifies Constitutional intent For lawyers, however, it creates endless business opportunities. That’s because case Law is technically complicated and requires a lawyer’s expertise to guide and move you through the system. The judicial system may begin with enacted laws, but the variations that result from a judge’s application of case law all too often change the ultimate meaning.
Lawyer domination
When a lawyer puts on a robe and takes the bench, he or she is called a judge. But in reality, when judges look down from the bench they are lawyers looking upon fellow members of their fraternity. In any other area of the free-enterprise system, this would be seen as a conflict of interest .
When a lawyer takes an oath as a judge, it merely enhances the ruling class of lawyers and judges. First of all, in Maricopa and Pima counties, judges are not elected but nominated by committees of lawyers, along with concerned citizens. How can they be expected not to be beholden to those who elevated them to the bench?
When they leave the bench, many return to large and successful law firms that leverage their names and relationships.
Business of law
The concept of “time” has been converted into enormous revenue for lawyers. The profession has adopted elaborate systems where clients are billed for a lawyer’s time in six-minute increments. The paralegal profession is another brainchild of the fraternity, created as an additional tracking and revenue center. High-powered firms have departmentalized their services into separate profit centers for probate and trusts, trial, commercial, and so forth.
The once-honorable profession of law now fully functions as a bottom line business, driven by greed and the pursuit of power and wealth, even shaping the laws of the United States outside the elected Congress and state legislatures.
Bureaucratic design
Today the skill and gamesmanship of lawyers, not the truth, often determine the outcome of a case. And we lawyers love it. All the tools are there to obscure and confound. The system’s process of discovery and the exclusionary rule often work to keep vital information off-limits to jurors and make cases so convoluted and complex that only lawyers and judges understand them.
The net effect has been to increase our need for lawyers, create more work for them, clog the courts and ensure that most cases never go to trial and are, instead, plea-bargained and compromised. All the while the clock is ticking, and the monster is being fed.
The sullying (corruption) of American law has resulted in a fountain of money for law professionals while the common people, who are increasingly affected by lawyer- driven changes and an expensive, self-serving bureaucracy, are left confused and ill-served.Today, it is estimated that 70 percent of low- to middle-income citizens can no longer afford the cost of justice in America. What would our Founding Fathers think?
This devolution of lawmaking by the judiciary has been subtle, taking place incrementally over decades. But today, it’s engrained in our legal system, and few even question it. But the result is clear.
The American Bar Association, Augustus Blackstone, 03-15-2006: The American BAR Association (and its State alter-egos) has, for all intents and purposes, taken over our entire federal, state, and local governments.† The legislative branch follows the advice of their BAR member advisors in the constructing of statutes.† The executive branch does the same in the enforcement of those statutes.† The judicial branch is literally a closed union shop in that regard.† You can’t be a judge unless you are BAR member and you can’t practice in their courts unless you are a BAR member.
The term BAR is an acronym for British Accredited Registry.† These snakes are in fact working for the Crown of England.† And that is why the gold fringed flags are in the courtrooms.† It signifies admiralty jurisdiction* [maritime law], which is another way of saying British jurisdiction [England is a maritime nation].† When you cross the bar in a courtroom, you are entering a British colonial forum.
There are over 30 grievances listed against the King of England in the Declaration of Independence (1776).† Nearly all of them are applicable today against the Crown of England via the BAR Association.† If you don’t have a copy, get one and read it.† Each grievance therein begins with He (in reference to the King).† As you read through the grievances, mentally supplant He with BAR Association, on behalf of the Crown of England and you’ll see exactly what I mean.
The root for the term attorney originates in Sanskrit (the oldest known language) and its original meaning was to turn or to twist.† That meaning carried forward largely unaltered into the English language.† The letter a, when used as a word, is defined as an indefinite article and when used as a prefix it equates with the word one (indefinite article) which modifies the base word (torn) accordingly as does the suffix ey.
The extra “t” is added to separate the two vowels for proper pronunciation in accordance with the rules of English grammar.† Thus, a-(t)torn-ey quite literally means one who turns (something).
This takes on added meaning when you understand that the legal profession in England has a number of titles (job descriptions), such as Esquire, Barrister, Solicitor, Counselor, Attorney, etc.† And each one has a very specific function within that monarchial system.† An English attorney’s function is to see that all titles and estates properly turn over to the legitimate heirs.† The closest equivalent to that function in this country would be an attorney who specializes in probate law.
It is no accident that the generic term used to describe a practitioner of law in this country is attorney.† As agents for the Crown of England, their function is to turn the sovereignty and wealth of this country back over to the Crown of England.† And they have just about succeeded.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
The American Bar Association (ABA) was first organized in 1878.† Its purposes were “to promote the administration of justice, to advance jurisprudence, to uphold professional honor, and to encourage social intercourse among lawyers.”† Jerold S. Auerbach, Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America (1976).† The “Federal Bar Association” was officially incorporated by Congress in 1954, Public Law 662, Chapter 911.
I have not yet been able to verify with certainty that BAR is indeed an acronym for British Accredited Registry.† According to Augustus Blackstone, the tie-in to the American Bar Association is the Inns of Court.† “The [American] Revolution swept away a `bar’ in the English sense of an upper branch of the profession, possessing certain special privileges by virtue of its connection with the Inns of Court.”† [PRESENT-DAY LAW SCHOOLS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1928, by Alfred Reed.]† However, the British Inns of Court eventually planted its roots on American soil.† The following quote was taken from the American Inns of Court web site:† The American Inns of Court adopted the traditional English model of legal apprenticeship and modified it to fit the particular needs of the American legal system.
So just what is the English model today?† Here is how Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed.) defines Inns of Court.† These are certain private unincorporated associations, in the nature of collegiate houses, located in London, and invested with the exclusive privilege of calling people to the bar, that is, conferring the rank or degree of a barrister.† They were founded probably about the beginning of the fourteenth century.† The principal inns of court are the Inner Temple, Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn.† The two former originally belonged to the Knights Templar.
The key question that Mr. Blackstone asks regarding the Inns of Court is:† Whose court is it?† The answer he gives is, of course, the Crown of England.
Even today in England admission to an Inn is required before registration on the Bar Vocational Course.† The Knights Templar is a secret society; they were the first international bankers.† Today the Knights Templar is also part of another secret society, Freemasonry.† Notice the use of the word degree in the Inns of Court definition above.† The word degree is a secret society term which refers to the level to which the initiate has risen.†
The initiate must take blood oaths in order to progress to higher levels of initiation.† A man who was a 32 degree Shriner Freemason left the secret society because the blood oaths became unconscionable and repulsive to him.† The blood oaths themselves imply or state that the initiate will suffer a most horrible death if he reveals the secrets of the lodge.† Some men have reported being required to drink blood from a skull as part of a Masonic initiation.† Many judges and lawyers are Freemasons.† In fact, a very large number of civil servants, from judges to presidents, are members of secret societies such as Skull & Bones, Knights of Malta and Freemasonry.
Can we trust judges and lawyers who are Freemasons?† According to the HANDBOOK OF MASONRY by Ronanyne, page 183:† You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Mason, and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason be always sure to shield him.† It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you’re keeping your obligations.
The following is the blood oath that Shriners take:† In willful violation whereof may I incur the fearful penalty of having my eyeballs pierced to thru center with a three edged blade, my feet flayed and forced to walk the hot sands upon the sterile shores of the red sea until the flaming Sun shall strike with a livid plague, and my Allah the god of Arab, Moslem and Mohammedan, the god of our fathers, support me to the entire fulfillment of the same.
Augustus Blackstone suggests that the sovereignty and wealth of America is being turned back to the Crown of England through Admiralty Jurisdiction.† This is not so far fetched as it may sound.† In the early 50s Norman Dodd was the Director of Research for a Congressional investigation into the tax-exempt Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations. †What he discovered was that these foundations were working together to control the educational system of America so that Americans would be indoctrinated into the principles of collectivism as opposed to the principles in the original united States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.†
Furthermore, here is what Mr. Dodd stated about Mr. Carnegie:† His publicly declared and steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain.† He was devoted just to putting the pieces back together again.† Mr. Dodd indicated that it was the bankers and lawyers who were making this possible.
Today the courts in America do in fact display a gold-fringed Admiralty flag.† However, the judges and prosecutors of the Bar Association always refuse to reveal the jurisdiction when asked.† The jurisdiction is a secret that they do not want people to know about.† This means that the Bar Association is, in fact, a secret society.†
On a few occasions judges have lied about their secret jurisdiction by stating that the court was under “statutory” jurisdiction.† [Read the Washington State Bar Association article or the Whitman County Corruption article for details.]† The imposition of Admiralty jurisdiction on land was one of the primary grievances that the colonists had against King George.† The first paragraph of the DECLARATION AND RESOLVES OF THE FIRST CONTINENTAL CONGRESS OF OCTOBER 14, 1774 sums it up:†
“Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British parliament, claiming a power, of right, to bind the people of America by statutes in all cases whatsoever, hath, in some acts, expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various pretences, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies, established a board of commissioners, with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties, but for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county.”
FOLLOW THE MONEY:† The Rothschilds and the Bank of England along with the London Banking houses ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks in America through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York.† As Alan Greenspan stated in London on September 25, 2002:† “The tie between the Bank of England and the Federal Reserve was cemented during the 1920s.”† Actually, that “tie” was formed even before the Federal Reserve Act was fraudulently passed in 1913.
It is also interesting to note that former President George Bush (Sr) was knighted by the Queen of England.† The founding fathers prohibited such title of nobility.† The question remains:† Who was George Bush actually serving when he was President- “We the People” or the British Empire?
It was George Bush (Sr.) who first publicly coined the expression New World ORDER.† Both George Bush, Jr. and George Bush, Sr. are members of the infamous Skull & bones secret society, aka “The ORDER”, which originally came from Germany.† Adolph Hitler wrote “My New ORDER” after writing “Mein Kampf”.† George Bush’s father, Prescott Bush, was also a Skull & Bones member along with Percy Rockefeller and Bush family business partners, the Harrimans.† Their symbol is, in fact, a skull and crossbones on the symbol for drugs, poison, piracy, death and the Nazi’s “Death’s Head” battalion.†
According to Dr. Leonard Horowitz, Prescott Bush joined John D. Rockefeller and the British Royal Family in sponsoring the eugenics initiatives that gave rise to Hitler’s racial hygiene programs.† Prescott Bush was found guilty of trading with the enemy (the Nazis) during WWII. †According to court records, the Rockefeller family and their Standard Oil Company supported Hitler more than they did the allies during WWII.† In fact one judge declared Mr. Rockefeller guilty of treason.† Dr. Gary Glum has also documented the insidious eugenics programs to create a “superior race”, which were initially sponsored not by Adolph Hitler, but by the American elite (i.e., the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman, Morgan, DuPont, Kellogg and Bush families).†
The Rockefeller family, along with their lawyer friends John and Allen Dulles, created the United Nations for the purpose of establishing a world government.† Allen Dulles became head of the CIA as did George Bush.† George Bush (Sr.) is an active participant in the CIA’s MKUltra mind control programs.
On February 1, 1992 George Bush (Sr.) addressed the General Assembly of the United Nations and stated:† It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.† Patriotic Americans view Bush’s statement as treasonous.† George Bush also stood before the United States Congress and stated that the New World Order is the rule of law.† Perhaps what he meant to say was rule of lawyers because it is the lawyers and judges in America who are in fact implementing the “New World Order” through fraud.† However, not all lawyers are aware of the ultimate plan of the global elite.
[The information given above are just tidbits to inspire the reader to conduct his or her own research into global elitist families and their insidious plans for a totalitarian world government and creation of a “superior race”.]
